QUOTE(Newsfeed @ Tue 25th October 2011, 9:13am)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
<img alt="" height="1" width="1" />
John Seigenthaler: “[b]Wikipedia, WikiLeaks and Wiccans: Historical Accuracy Onlineâ€[/b]Vanderbilt University NewsWatch video of John Seigenthaler, a nationally recognized advocate for the First Amendment also known for his criticism of Internet vandals who post false information on user-created sites like Wikipedia, speaking Oct. 21 at Vanderbilt's Central
...<a href="http://news.google.com/news/more?pz=1&ned=us&ncl=doKQQKwH862hamM" target="_blank"></a>
View the articleThis what a real defender of free speech looks like.
Not like this.I couple of points new to me:
05:05 JS requested to Mr.Wales that the defamatory information not be made available to even the 1,100 admins. This was never done but I'm pleased that he asked. Otherwise he would be accepting the "please whisper when you call my wife a whore" approach so common on the internet when remedies like moving information to unsearchable areas etc are seen as complete remedies.
38:20 Well thought out rejection of "So-Fix-It."