[url="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&ct2=us&usg=AFQjCNFVjWOnDf1xg7gJsNZeNTm35Jz7Lw&clid=c3a7d30bb8a4878e06b80cf16b898331&ei=UU8EW9jrGIXRqgLeiau4Bg&url=http://www.thefashionlaw.com/home/blatant-ads-advertorial-tones-paid-for-posts-how-brands-might-be-gaming-wikipedia"][img]https://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQcPVAbIEdO_oyWRkk6vgURKglSRNCWFhBQOtjd0HqK8QI4-jUvP8bmOXzCxOVMwylaZP6PetrL[/img]
The Fashion Law (blog)[/url]
•Advertorial Tones and Paid-For Posts: Are Brands Trying to Game Wikipedia?
The Fashion Law (blog)
If you are looking for Lyst on Wikipedia, you won't find it. The page was deleted this month because, it turns out, the London-based fashion search platform's page ran afoul of Wikipedia's guidelines. Instead of providing “information about [a] company ...



View the article