[url="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&ct2=us&usg=AFQjCNFjl_XYllaEKmyRi2UM8hcqppzurA&clid=c3a7d30bb8a4878e06b80cf16b898331&ei=sSSeW-66K4nazQbO74noBQ&url=https://www.science20.com/robert_walker/ why_its_easy_to_improve_on_wikipedia_in_specialist_encyclopedias_ours_are_for_as
trobiology_microtonal_music_and"][img]https://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTKivwRlfGrJFeGz35zAxPikVMTt9f49fowm4uUn0WFEB-QfovoR9wxL1AmLgzNxcm045hnrPal[/img]
Science 2.0[/url]
•Why It's Easy To Improve On Wikipedia In Specialist Encyclopedias (Ours Are For Astrobiology, Microtonal Music, And ...
Science 2.0
This originated as my answer to a Quora question: "In what general knowledge domains do alternatives to Wikipedia exist that are significantly superior?". So - I think my own new wikis are, for a simple reason. Because they are based on the Wikipedia ...



View the article