[url="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&ct2=us&usg=AFQjCNGodLIvedDPQGgIdBwWO32nLPQMHQ&clid=c3a7d30bb8a4878e06b80cf16b898331&ei=mva1W-jiNYGWqgKluoLQAg&url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/nobel-winner-was-not-impressive-enough-for-wikipedia-jx6pn7v2v"][img]https://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSQs0PSMeTpIpcbYxMQ6rnuSZhab2Nk6BsnQ0b4Kafppil8GW5-cmUMKDxLoxq6LTqiIsyR9rIo[/img]
The Times[/url]
•Nobel winner was not impressive enough for Wikipedia
The Times
Well, it's one way to win a Wikipedia editing war. On May 23 a new biographical entry was rejected from the online encyclopedia on the grounds that the subject, a female scientist, did not meet “notability guidelines”. This week Donna Strickland won ...



View the article