You think that things will become a bit normal again after the flood of posts all over the internet after David Pasternack’s 3rd negative post about SEO, just to get ”stabbed” from yet another side. I won’t link to the post by Jason Calcanis and add to the number of inbound links to his blog to play [...]

Article: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/searc...nal.com/?p=4387

For the curious, here's a handy multi-diff link to the WP article this guy altered, apparently to defend the SEO industry against accusations of scamming people:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=106814912

Nowhere in the current version of the Search_engine_optimization article does it mention Wikipedia's own dominance of Google results, or the effect it's having on the SEO "industry," which I think any realistic person would say is worth at least a sentence or two - if not an entire subsection.

Maybe they are aiming to become non-notable. Let's all wish them the best of luck with that.

Jonny