Wikipedia has had plenty of bad publicity lately. Allow me to bring you up to date.

Article: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/searc...nion/edbeam.php

Something tells me we are going to see a lot more stories like these. It appears that the bloom is off the rose where the mainstream media is concerned. But then, I suppose that was to be expected. Journos always take note when a source lies his head off to one of their number, and then accuses the scribbler of grossly unethical/unprofessional conduct when the source's lies are exposed. They HATE that.

As well they should!

(And welcome to the forum, by the way!)

Thanks!