QUOTE(Yahoo! News @ Tue 10th April 2007, 7:23am)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
Jimmy Wales, the founder of Wikipedia, stops by VCU for a discussion on culture in the digital age.
Article: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/searc...icle_id=4645106Less than 24 hours after Jimbo's appearance, a Wikipedia administrator (our beloved User:
Durova) issued a “
one-month lock down†on the article about VCU in Wikipedia, citing some “conflict of interest†editing that VCU Professor Buffington was encouraging her students to make (with good intentions and in good faith).
This further shows how insensitive and somewhat “out of touch†with reality that Wikipedia's admin authorities can be. They expect that this notion that every editor must write only on topics where they have no personal conflict of interest should be inherently obvious to everyone. Pet shop owners should write the [[Nuclear physics]] article. Senior managers at nuclear power plants should write the [[hamster]] article. It makes so much sense, in the construction of an authoritative encyclopedia, doesn't it?
I’m in dialogue now with Professor Buffington, helping her to see that there are better ways. Better ways, my friends.
Greg