QUOTE(Yahoo! News @ Thu 12th April 2007, 2:32pm)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
If you check out the Google search results for most terms, you’ll find Wikipedia at or near the top of the list. The popular user-collaborated encyclopedia has more page views than Digg and MySpace, and could be largest untapped resource in online marketing to date. Danny Sullivan moderated today’s session focused on the viability of Wikipedia as an online marketing tool. The ...
Article: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/searc...-with-wikipediaWikipedia as a marketing tool'd be worse than Russian Roulette. Take it from me (pun intended). Paid editors seem to work, and nonprofit volunteer editors claim to get in there, though the latter's much more ethical right now IMHO. I don't see what I want about it on many levels, if not all.
Come to think of it, I've asked our secretary-treasurer, a Stanford MBA and Master of Finance from UCLA, whether nonprofits even use the term "marketing." The jury's out as far as I'm concerned on the question, but where the for-profit world has "sales," the nonprofit has "fundraising."
Vincent