Yes, that is a question I´m increasingly asking (and I came to the Review so the I could diss her -and not get blocked). I think the questions she asks are quite relevant. (Of course, it is the mother of all ironies that Slimmy is asking them )

I guess one reason that we still react the way we do towards Slimmy is that she never, ever admit to doing wrong. It is as if her personality is too weak, too fragile to admit the possibility that she is not perfect.

I wish that somebody who was friendly with Slimmy could give her some good advise, like: at the next opportunity apologise publicly on WP for defending Matanmoreland...and for blocking Wordbomb. (Regretting it privately on some Skype-conversation isn´t quite enought...not when all her abuse was quite public.) I think she would be very, very surprised by the amount of forgiveness such an act would be met with.



Hwooooha, lovely! Muuuchhh nicer than the Virgin! (IMHO) That "malevolent scowl" was due to all those grown-up ladies hugging you all the time, right? And you were helpless to prevent it?

i for one am not impressed with slim's newfound insights into the arbcom. sure, she reads the writing on wall and realizes the committee as a whole is no longer the loyal ally that it once was, so she makes what seems to me an obvious tactical move to direct public attention to its many faults as a way to further undermine its legitimacy. personally, i think arbcom is becoming ineffective for the same reasons slim is, too many people are following their bullshit, but that being the case, i don't think the arbs could do more than "giano" slim if they wanted to. they never had the backbone to take more than superficial symbolic actions against giano, i don't see them doing anything more substantial against slim.

Moulton sent me another interesting reply, but he was apparently over his limit:

Thanks for that. It was a good pun the first few times Moulton used it. It is a little worn by now, not wrong, just worn.

So any fallout?