Slim's shrill response on Lar's talk page is:
QUOTE
Lar, if you don't stop posting snide remarks about me, [8] I'm going to approach the ArbCom for relief. You've been asked many times to stop by several editors. There's no call for it, and I won't respond in kind. It's particularly depressing to see it extend to you lending support to a LaRouche editor who's trying to prevent the LaRouche bio from being improved (and in such a way that any reasonable person would see was an improvement). If you have a low opinion of me, just stay away from me, and I'll continue to do the same for you. Or we should seek private mediation, as I suggested in a recent e-mail to which you didn't respond. But the current one-way public sniping is not acceptable. SlimVirgin - 05:14, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Emphasis mine. This, ladies and gentleman, would be Slim laying the groundwork for a future "harassment" charge against Lar.
It seems like a reasonable request to me--they clearly don't get along and their interactions aren't productive, so simply ignoring each other seems like a good solution. Why must everything be interpreted as some kind of Machiavellian plot?
Perhaps it's just me, but "I'm going to approach the ArbCom for relief," if said in just the right way, sounds vaguely suggestive. Are you up for this job, CHL?
There's much about SV that could be fixed with a nice permanent topic ban from about 10 areas, much as was done to the Scientology editors. It's a shame that when she got de-sysoped for 6 months, Arbcom didn't think of doing that.