QUOTE(MZMcBride @ Mon 27th June 2011, 7:16pm)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
Carcharoth
posted a statement on his user page that he asked I reference here.
Might as well post it:
QUOTE(Carcharoth)
Note on the off-wiki June 2011 publication of posts from the arbcom-l mailing list: Some of what I wrote on the arbcom-l mailing list while I was an arbitrator has been published in various forums on Wikipedia Review (starting in June 2011, along with many other posts from the archives), I've been following some of those threads and the responses and analysis there. The following is a brief general response on my part, and is likely to be all I have to say on the matter unless I am asked directly about a specific issue. From what I've seen so far, while some of the correct conclusions are being drawn in some of the Wikipedia Review threads, in some discussions people are going off on a tangent and/or misunderstanding things because context is missing, or they are cherry-picking things to draw conclusions they want to reach. My view is that unless the wider context is included, any analysis of these archives (some of which I have not seen either) should be treated with caution, especially considering the source and the selective method of release of the posts.
Carcharoth is one of the admins I've noted in the past for his lack of being a WP:DICK (which makes him stand out). But his statement above is kind of useless. No piece of information is ever as useful as it would be without "wider context", but since this is a bunch of secret leaks, we're not going to get that, and are unlikely to in the foreseeable future. So the idea that we should not draw any conclusions in the meantime is rather silly. We'll never have all the information we need for any purpose anywhere, on this planet, in this life. We're stuck with the job of thinking with the information we DO have, in the meantime. That is all. It's a continuous fact-of-life and it's inescapable.
If Carcharoth has any information he'd like to add to help WR put this arbcom-l information "in wider context" he's welcome to post it. Otherwise, quit whining. You can't keep some bunch of crap secret, then complain that people are apt to fill in (strange 17-minute) gaps for themselves, when they find out the rest of it. What exactly do you expect? The gaps are YOUR fault. Nobody's going to keep an open mind and suspend judgment due to lack of information, when YOU-ALL are the one withholding it.
This is very reminiscent of the govenment, which normally "classifies" its crimes, lies, and mistakes-- then goes off on a tangent about espionage and national security when somebody finds out some of the dirt. Sorry, but nobody should be deflected from finding out about malice and incompetence, when secrecy is not the real issue and never was. When secrecy is mere coverup for crimes, lies and mistakes, it should be seen as what it is, which is abetting, further lying, and coverup that propagates error in the future, including all future damage that will be caused. Such secrecy is no more deserving of respect than the confidences kept by any person of ill-will and ill-action. Which is to say, it's not. It requires sunlight as disinfectant. We'd like to hear all those whitehouse tapes.
Fuck you with the partial transcripts we already have, Tricky Dicks.
Carc asked me to post a response to your post (which he described as baiting, and I'd tend to agree). This will be the last time I proxy for Mr. Carcharoth for now. You're free to e-mail him as you see fit.
I'll note that I'd completely forgotten that Mr. Carcharoth is no longer an Arbitrator, and I think many others have forgotten this or don't realize it. His term expired in December 2010, (among other things) removing all his access to the archives, etc.