To Autumn led to an FAR about the changes because it introduced many problems. It was not "fixed" with the community preferring my version. There is a great comment by Rlevse (ha!) that summarizes the concern of the community regarding the changes: " I've restored the pre-TFA version. A lot of the subsequent edits are really don't do much. For one thing, Amandajm inserted Sparknotes as refs and they're still there. That's utterly astounding. I'm not going to get into the merits of point of view A vs B, but a FA with sparknotes as refs is not a better version."

One is not "many" so your point is a failure. There are also none that "had" to be rewritten, so your point fails yet again. But you are a sock puppet, so you started off seeking failure.

What a fucking troll! Anyone who you don't like must be a sockpuppet. Of whom? Santa Claus?

And you claimed "And my articles have to be completely rewritten? Ahahaha. None of them have been." So the fact that one has been proves you're a bloody liar.

Really? You were outed as socking on this forum a long time ago. You have been proven wrong by everyone here who was a long standing member of the community and known to not be the same person. It isn't a coincidence that the only people agreeing with you are blatantly lying (like you have done), pretend to be British when they clearly aren't, and are all new members with no linked accounts. Funny how that works out.

Now bug off.

Link?

Hey, totally wrong again, as always. I can trace my British ancestry back certainly through several generations. Do you have any ancestry that you'd admit to?

You obviously never paid attention to this forum, because I have both detailed my ancestry plus multiple people here have shown that you are faking your Britness. For your information, I can trace my ancestry back to Ulrich Renz, who served under Maximillion I. The line had quite a bit of Prussian nobility in it before and after, and I can trace it back to Burgundians who served at various points as mercenaries for the Romans and others. Going forward, I am directly connected to Henry Lightner, drummer of Fort McHenry during the battle, and I am cousin to two bishops (Eccleston and Carroll) along with cousins to the Calvert and Charles Carroll line. My family history fills more binders than Mitt Romney's women.

Maybe you guys should act like Egyptian mummies and wrap this up.

Hmm. A search does not reveal that you have ever mentioned this on WR before, unless you did so in some secret forum. However, this ancestry you are now claiming scarcely amounts to being British, so it is scarcely relevant. And of course you cannot accuse me of being a new member, and if i do not link to my (never blocked) username on WP, nor does The Joy. The Joy is of course right to point out that we should now stop this thread, which has generated vastly more heat than light.

I never claimed to be British. I have talked about my Prussian heritage a few times as well as other people I am related to. No matter what name you hop on, you are consistently illiterate. It is your tell. When you make yet another identity, try to pay more attention and maybe you wont be so easily found out.

Where? It doesn't show up in a search.

It is quite laughable that someone with such total lack of reading comprehension should call someone else illiterate. You keep making wild asertions which you can never justify when asked. You failed to substantiate your claim that Retrospect was outed as socking on this forum a long time ago (not surprising, as he never has been). Now you accuse me of being a sock, which is of course absurd. Now please let's do what The Joy says and just wrap up this nonsense.

Are you an idiot? I have over 2000 posts here. The "search" function doesn't necessarily find everything.



It is "assertions" not "asertions." When you are calling others illiterate, please attempt to spell words in a proper manner. Then, when you try to attack me like you did, don't hallucinate first or use drugs. Otherwise, you get the blather like you put before. I know you are trying to wake up early to post so it seems like you are in Europe (really, 7 AM is the best you can do? I have earlier posts here than the faux Brit sock ring you are trying to fool people with) but it is no excuse for you making things up. You have been proven wrong over and over, and no amount of holding your ears and saying "lalala" will change that fact.

Provide a bloody link then. You keep being asked but you never can because the posts don't exist and never did.

Fact is, I'm in England as is proved by my IP. You're in la-la-land. Now just listen to nice Mr. The Joy and drop it, or at least revert to the subject of the thread.

Nope. Sorry. I don't have to. You asked my heritage, I produced it. I actually produced actual aspects of it that are identifiable unlike your false claims. Your trolling to hide even further when exposed as an idiot is telling.

Hey, that's why you'll never get a PhD, because you keep making shithead assertions that you can't back up, whether it's about Keats or yourself or the sensible people here. Now will you withdraw your bloody lie that I've ever been accused here of being a sock?

Really? You think so? Amusing how little you actually know.

You are a sock and everything you've stated in this thread has been wrong. You have lost any respect you could have had by the regulars here and you only have yourself as an echo chamber. When Selina logs in, she will hopefully erase you and your puppets.

Smug in your ruddy little cocoon, aren't you? I'm not a sock and nobody here except you thinks that. If you deny that, ruddy prove it.

Back to trying to sound like a Brit again? Funny. No one here but your socks bothered to support you on any point. Seems that the long standing community thinks you are full of it. It must suck that the only support you will ever get is from yourself. Lonely and isolated, forever wrong at everything and doomed to failure. Most people would have learned by now. But you will never learn.

Well, we thought that on the other site, FWIW.

His obsession (and lack of knowledge) about my dissertation and his new state of existence was why most people know he is Vigilant. There is other, more technical information that links the two, but it doesn't really matter. Blatant socks are blatant.

I thought it was our BDSM friend from London? Are we getting our socks mixed-up?

Of course, in Ottava la-la-land, that must be so. Anyone who dares to argue with ruddy high-and-mighty must be a sock, of me or someone else. Don't you know circular logic when you see it, shithead?


Which other site?

Really? Really? Now you are trying to play dumb after it was already pointed out everything is against you? Bad troll is bad.

[quote]
Which other site?
[/quote]
Really? Really? Now you are trying to play dumb after it was already pointed out everything is against you? Bad troll is bad.
[/quote]
Since you don't know which other site, how do you expect me to know?

You are dense. I know the other site as does The Joy. The Joy is a member there. I am not. No one can post the name here because of Selina's edit filter. Stop trolling.

Come off it, Ottava. Plenty of people here have found ways round the filter.

Can we have a sweepstake on how long before Ottava accuses me of being a sock?

You were already accused of being a sock when you first started, and I accused you multiple times so far.

What you say doesn't count. Who else has ever called me a sock?

It is easy to look. You've always been labelled as a Poetlister sock. You are sure starting to act like one. No wonder you can't ever stay on topic.

Even Iceland wants that: http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-e...ban-pornography

Missed that one. Ottava is totally obsessed with nonsense, which is why nobody on any reputable site ever takes him seriously.

Hey, I've just seen a copy of the 10th edition of the Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary. It says "The Collegiate Dictionary draws upon Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged, America's most comprehensive dictionary of the English language." Pity Ottava's given up and run away so he can't explain that away!

Don't be silly, Retrospect. Ottava would just say that he knows better than the publishers.