QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Sun 5th December 2010, 3:29pm)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
QUOTE(Doc glasgow @ Sun 5th December 2010, 2:49pm)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
And in the end, aside from Peter, who cares?
Who cares about a pack of lies, after all? Note that Doc was in on the Dec 22 IRC chat, and thus was one of those who knew from the beginning.
Rough timeline.
Dec 2007-April 2008 - FT2, Gerard + 1 other admin (possibly Doc?) + Scribe, + Cary Bass and Jimbo knew. Thatcher also knew from observing the edits disappear, but as far as I know was not involved in the email exchanges.
This was kept pretty well secret until April 2008, when Arbcom got to hear about it. There was then a wider conspiracy to keep the whole thing secret. Part of this was offering me a lift on the ban, which with hindsight I should never have accepted.
In July 2008, FT2 said he had never heard of such a thing happening.
In November 2008, Giano finally revealed what had happened (I don't know how he found out), saying publicly. “Over the last year I have known [about the edits], but been unable to prove it, I have been stonewalled wherever I turned and found myself unable to trust anybody. FT2 and Gerard were untouchable and had me blocked at every opportunity. … A week or so ago I obtained positive proof that Gerard had indeed tampered with FT2's edits during the election with an invalid oversight reason outside of policy, especially as they pertained to a subject about which FT2 was being questioned during his campaign for Arbcom. So basically Gerard and FT2 are disgraced and and FT2 is an Arb by fraud. "
People like Doc immediately were saying 'what's so interesting about that, everyone knows about that' and so on. Like they hadn't been conspiring for months to cover it up.
From November to January 2009, FT2 persistently stonewalled questions about why he said he knew nothing (and denied again in November) about the oversighting.
Finally in January he was blocked by Bishonen, there was an RfC, and FT2 had to resign.
To those like Doc who say 'who cares', I say 'yes, but if it is that trivial, why cover it up'. It's the official lying after the event, and the conspiracy to cover it up, that we should care about.
The oversighted edits were in themselves quite trivial. It's the three years of banning and blocking and persistent lying and resignations that are significant.
What paranoid nonsense.
I knew nothing, took no interest, and still don't follow the ins and out of all of this. It strikes me as pure obscurantism.
From what I gather, some edits were irregularly oversighted, in somewhat unclear circumstances. It's a bit muddy as to whether FT2 was involved in this or not - and he's evidently been less than forthcoming on the point, which is enough "smoke" that with or without the fire, I certainly didn't support his return to arbcom.
Beyond that, I think the issue has been that those semi-involved haven't looked too closely at it, and by the time they did, others, who cared all too passionately about it, had convinced themselves that there was some vast wiki-wide conspiracy. I suspect all there actually is is a somewhat embarrassed FT2 digging himself deeper into a hole.
So, he's in a hole. Whether there's fire behind the smoke, I've no idea: but the smoke will be enough to keep him off arbcom, and beyond that nothing really matters.
Indeed, had FT2 had the wisdom not to presented himself as an arbcom candidate, who would care? Maybe he lied - well, so what? What difference does it make now?