What Joe Decker? Any diffs?
But generally speaking I cannot blame a kid who wants to have a power (become admin) I do blame adults who allow that to happen. I am more than sure wikipedia has destroyed many young lives. These wikipedia kids do not yet understand what wikipedia did to them, and when they will it could be too late to fix. One of these kids said http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Armbrust
except I do not believe he did retire. Wikipedia is addictive and kids and some adults too have difficulties quitting. I feel sorry for them. They are robbed of their lives.

I mentioned this in an earlier post as follows (underlined are diffs and links etc.):

Also revealing is this

== NOTICE ==

This is a Warning from The Wikipedia RC Patrol.

Please stop adding sexually explicit content and nonsense to Wikipedia.

Further attempts to do so will result in implications against your user account.

Thank you

he put on Joe Decker's Talk page 14 March 2006, again less than a month after AGK started his account, the only possible edit from this respected editor and administrator it can refer to being an edit Joe made on the ongoing Roman Catholic paedophilia scandals at the time.

Joe responded with

As I've asked on your talk page, please provide a reference to any such abuse, I believe your complaint is without basis.

and indeed you can see on AGK's Talk Page that Joe responded there on 15 March 2006, except that everything on brother Anthony's cfc Talk page from its creation 27 February 2006 to 25 January 2007 has been revision deleted ...

So here we have Anthony as a young 15 year old Roman Catholic boy trying to repress, less than a month after Anthony started his account, a good faith edit on the Roman Catholics paedophilia scandals by a respected editor destined to become an administrator himself. Certainly immature of course, but it's more than just that: it, and others like it, are indicative of a degree of self-importance which I would qualify as pathological, perhaps indeed a reflection of the obsessive compulsive and bipolar disorders he mentions but I'm inclined to suggest narcissistic.



Yes, I agree with this exactly. If he is not simply a persona, a sham like Essjay, then AGK, Anthony of old, was vulnerable and spending far too much of his time on Wikipedia. He says he was academically gifted, and yet we don't see evidence of further study from him. I'm not sure at what age he started to receive direct tuition in becoming an admin (that did happen) but I suspect he was under the age of eighteen at the time. I can imagine a situation where his parents might not have wanted that to happen, rather wanted to discourage his fascination with Wikipedia (a fascination entirely with to do with its supervision and gaining power, disinterested in contributing content himself). I don't say this is so, but I can well imagine it and that there other parents similarly affected, likewise bringing up socially isolated or awkward adolescents like Anthony who become obsessed with Wikipedia.

In this case we have a boy who says he suffers from a well defined mental illness being mentored by the community and encouraged to 'train' as administrator.

I think that is very questionable indeed.

That was sarcasm, you fucking retard.

Let me make this real clear for you; the Wikimedia Foundation thinks you're a bat-shit insane lunatic. They either brush you off, ignore you, or revert your trolling from their talk pages.

Nothing you have said to them matters.

You are deranged.

On the contrary - I now believe that virtually everything Ms. Mbz1 has written or said to the Wikimedia Foundation during the last several months has not only been heard and listened to, but has actually been enshrined as core policy, informing all aspects of Wikipedia governance. Indeed, I think it's clear that all significant WMF initiatives are now being specifically routed through Ms. Mbz1 for comment and approval, and nothing happens there anymore without her express permission and recommendation.

What's more, this is also a big step up from the person who fulfilled this role for the WMF in the past, namely former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich.

Tarc, you know about how you say you can be a prick....

I read a story about academically gifted 15 years old boy. He developed a test to check for cancer, and was awarded $75,000. I wonder, if he has an account on Wikipedia

AGK is probably academically gifted too because I personally cannot imagine how one could spend at least 40 hours per week working on the matters related to the governance of wikipedia and do not fell behind in his Uni's study.

well he says he is, but I don't see any of it in his edits. Looking at his time stamps there seems to be no settled pattern beyond a preference for editing late at night. One plausible suggestion is that he is on disability benefits in the UK and doesn't work.

I think it's very likely that there are juveniles editing Wikipedia to the detriment of their studies. But I'm not certain that AGK is a juvenile. What you say about addiction is quite certain, young people without a life editing 16 hours a day or more.

On the whole I favour his being a sock, indeed of Astrotrain, and the account entirely a persona in the manner of Essjay, the motivation being quite possibly to gain access to juveniles. I have yet to analyse his RfAs, but I expect to find the sudden surge of support at his second RfA to stem from juvenile connections he made while being mentored for administration. I don't really buy the Scots, I suspect he is Canadian. I also don't think he is a genuine trainspotting anorak, not obsessed enough. Pretty sure that's just a pose. Likewise all the stuff about Celtic football club, being a trainee pilot and so on. I'm afraid I'm pretty sure he is a fairly pathological fraud. It is indeed worrying what his motivation really can be.

Of course he could be from NSA or something like that, always to be borne in mind with checkusers.

I shall write various contacts in the world of media over the weekend to see if I can't drum up some interest in the story here. There is a story here of course.

How might we define late at night? If indeed he is Canadian, is he not in a different time zone from Scotland? Edits at midnight in Glasgow are at 4pm in Vancouver I think.

Well, it seems to be UTC the time stamp, but I can't directly confirm it for View History. Is that right? At any rate that's what's in a signature on a Talk page. So midnight UTC would be 7 pm Montreal time if I'm doing my arithmetic right.

What struck me about the Scots thing is that having joined the Scottish wikipedia, he didn't make a single edit there, not one. I do find that curious.

I divide admins in categories:

There are some admins that become admins to make Wikipedia a better, fairer and safer place. Alison is probably a good example of this kind of admins.

There are some admins that become admins just to have the tools, which they rarely (never) use. They are mostly interested in adding content to wikipedia, and for them being an admin is just something that is nice to have. You seldom almost never see them commenting on drama boards or imposing idiotic blocks.

And there are some admins that become admins to gain as much power on as many wikipedia projects as they possibly could. In most cases these users are lonely, have no friends in a real life and might suffer from mental or physical illnesses that prevent them from going out, having a girlfriend, doing sports, having fun and simply living a normal life. It is quit sickening that WMF shamelessly exploits these kind of users. Besides WMF does not understand or simply does not care that these kind of admins do the most damage to the project. It is doubtful that between these admins there are lots of "academically gifted" ones simply because "academically gifted" people prefer creative work not police one.

And of course there are admins that fell in between of the groups I described.

I actually don't know enough about Wikipedia to know how worthwhile your characterisation might be. But I think that third category of yours might well describe a typical group.

Exploitation? Well it's a thought. Certainly there must be a point when common sense ought to step in and one thinks to oneself, "well this is a very immature individual who is plainly little more than a child and I should be avoiding encouraging this one, should in fact be discouraging him".

That reminds me of the terrible story of the paediatrician who was forced to flee her house after vandals daubed it with graffiti in the middle of the night, not knowing the difference between a paediatrician and a paedophile.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2000/aug/30/c...tection.society

Yes, I remember that. Well I hope those hysterical excesses are well and truly over. However there's no question that the abuses they reflected were real and ongoing, and as the recent case of conniving at abuse by an American football coach testifies, still to be completely put to rights.

I often blog this, but the British poet George Barker penned some memorable lines around 1945 in his True Confession which show the problem was known and understood a long time ago: the poet is describing his early adolescence -

There was a priest, a priest, a priest,
A Reverend of the Oratory
Who taught me history. At least
He taught me the best part of his story.
Fat Father William, have you ceased
To lead boys up the narrow path
Through the doors of the Turkish Bath?
I hope you're warm in Purgatory.

Copyright vio of the whole poem here: it's been there at least the ten years or so I've referred to it.

Yep, and I will stick it to this psychotic asshole every opportunity I get. It is amazing just how disconnected from reality Mila is, she still thinks she's the victim in all of this.

And its relevance to you is?

Well the good news here is that I've finally shifted all that backlog of diverse duties we sock puppeteers living the life of riley off public funds somehow nevertheless seem to accumulate despite our best efforts to contract as much of it out as we possibly can, and I now have a whole week ahead of me to demonstrate to WR how a real expert in the field approaches her work (erm ... incidentally can someone PM me a pointer to Risker; I did get the dear old bat some time ago, but I've completely forgotten it now and also how I got there, somwehere in Canada and basically that's all that lingers - point being I'm beginning to rather strongly suspect for certain reasons it would be invidious to speculate upon at this moment in time that AGK is in fact a sock of Risker, the inner child struggling to get out as it were, and hence the sudden interest; well I've always thought that behind that innocent james blunt wouldn't come in my face deary me no look she so plausibly affects she is basically a very naughty lady indeed, no fool me with sheep's eyes pulling my woolies thank you).

Anyway, basically I've got as far as Anthony's next edit following his enterprising two minute Atkinson where he felt himself called out to deal with a critical situation that had developed at [[Limestone]] where someone had made the curious contribution

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA fUCK OFF fUCKERS/ HOBO / FAG/ HOES

I mean god what do you do faced with something like that ... but our Anthony nevertheless finds it within himself to rise once more to the occasion ... he only just bleeding deletes it completely neutralised just like that as it had never been there if you know what I'm getting at there and calmly replaces it with

THIS IS A FINAL WARNING. IF YOU VANDALISE AGAIN YOU WILL BE BLOCKED.

Sincerly, (sic)

RC Patrol

JOBBY WELL DONE!!!! PHWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAW

(just to clarify - the incredulous JOBBY WELL DONE!!!! PHWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAW there comes from me and not Anthony).

Tomorrow, or possibly later on today depending how many kickings I'm signed on for today, I will analyse this in a little more detail, because as Karl Marx so famoulsy observed the child is father of the man, but for now the thinking must be, has got to be - how in fact does Anthony find these things in the first place, becauseI never have any luck. I mean, really, come the end of an evening and a stressful day kicking kicking kicking always having to fucking kick your way through life no fucking escape ever sort day we all get them come on don't pretend, I often think to myself it would be great fun to find something really disgusting on Wikipedia like that, perhaps savour it with a glass of full bodied Chianti and a leisurly two minute atkinson with loads of cream sauce the other hand, before kicking it into touch where it so richly deserves to rot in the gutter and then finding the fucking little cunt who wrote the filth in the first place and fucking well telling him in no uncertain terms how he can fucking expect his testicles to be relocated if he fucking keep on with his shit ... but I never do, that's the point, I mean the occasional reference to NAMBLA, but come on hand on heart who can honestly deny ever slipping in one of those themselves every now and then wikipedia being what it is. Course not, but the real thing ... no never, nooit, nunquam as they say in Syria. So how does he manage it? What's the secret?

That's what I'd really like to know!

PS. This is how the edit actually looked http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anthonycfc_1.jpg. Can't promise it will stay up there, if not you can always use the diff to inspect it.

OMG I've just realised I think that's only his own fucking template he's bleeding done there ("level 4"... phwaaaaw, will you just look at that) oh god oh god oh god I love him I love him I love him just to fleetingly hold his trembling anthony king safe and warm between my grateful thighs oh god that would be heaven and heaven the mountain trees stilled to silence as I blow his name from peak till peak oh joy oh joy oh joy the dear dear boy well I mean of course when he's like 21 NOT THEN BUT NOW come on what do think I am and since we are at it I'm a fucking woman as I have in fact have had numerous occasions to point out before in these blogs so don't you go trying to outpedo me as forums like WR always try to do grow up can't we just be serious for once in our lives?

And then there's the 13 March 2006 [[Carolina Panthers]] edit where AGK pretends to block the page with a template (right ... he's blocking an article so he says), announcing that offensive material has been included and this has been deleted and the whole article should be rewritten according to guidelines, but in fact deletes the whole article. An suspenseful atkinsonian two minutes later (phwaaaw) the edit is in fact reverted by Nakon, specialising at the time he seems in making wholesale reverts of vandalism, but there's no evidence of any interaction between AGK and Nakon, no evidence that it's some sort of training exercise in real life with REAL BULLETS UNDER LIVE FIRE (PHWAAAW), no rather, on the face of it, it seems to be Anthony in very good faith pretending to be an adminstrator or something pretending to block an article while deleting its entire contents. If there was any explanation forthcoming then it's been revision deleted and we are no the wise.

Dear boy! (yes, yes, I do understand it's suspect but I would just like point out that I'm a mature lady of a certain age whatever Risker might say who after all ought to know better, Risker I mean of course, and he himself is a strapping young lad of 21 and that I'm completely prepared to address all issues raised about it fully and frankly to set minds at rest). Thank You.

I'm going to though all these rather strange first year edits now before commenting further (don't want to hog the forum here ... heavens no). I can't get an IP address for him. That's so strange. He comes on to the project with some definite aims it seems of contributing to Scottish railway stations and things Scottish, presumably with the intention of creating some article starts as one normally does, but \i don't see any of those and i don't see any prior IP activity in those limited Scottish articles he does edit. In the meantime he engages in a series of what can only be described as fantasy edits involving the policing of Wikipedia.

Finished here. I can find a single IP adress from Glasgow but the user is plainly Scots whereas Anthony really isn't and anyway it's a Rangers supporter. The editing pattern quickly tails away into tedious, I expect not very enlightening, admin duties I can't be bothered with anyway. This really is an account entirely uninterested in contributing content. Even the railway station content amounts to little more than somewhat inconsequential edits at not more than a dozen railway stations, the epoymous (why does that word keep on cropping up?) Cambuslang railway station being the most developed, such as half a page or of material can be.

My most optimistic guess is that the account is indeed a sock of Astrotrain, that it is indeed an adult posing as a juvenile, and my most optimistic suggestion for why that might be so is that Astrotrain developed administrater ambitions he couldn't possibly fulfill given his history of edit warring.

POSSIBLE PROXY: Possible Anthony proxy 212.135.1.83 (info via an impersonated account). I'll get that to my experts and report back if they make anything of it. Anthony sufficient pissed by the impersonation to take it to an ANI. Apparently he was being accused of coming from Cambuslang and being gay and a sic prik.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?t...&oldid=73498011

Mbz gets told off by yet another WMF employee. Have you worked your way through the list yet?

When it rains, it pours;shit-canned from meta again.

http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?titl...age=User%3AMbz1

What are you happy about, idiot?
That power-hungry teenaged bullies block all prolific content contributors and will leave wikipedia with self-describeid bulldogs?
And I thought you like wikipedia
Oh yes, tarc the bulldog, gwen gale has not imposed any bad block for the last 6 months, and I am sure she never will, and no matter how much you will bark it was me, who did it, and it was the best thing I did for wikipedia, you know stopping a bully at the time!

You fucked-in-the-head cunt, NOTHING you did has had any effect whatsoever on Gwen Gale's editing or blocking or recent lack thereof. She never bullied anyone at any time, you have lied and distorted and misrepresented that entire situation.

You are nobody. You do not matter. You are universally derided in just about every corner of the Wikimedia project that you touch.

You are a fucking psychopath with a dangerously obsessive focus on Gwen Gale and every step she makes. If I were her, I'd have the cops hunt you down, lock you in jail and throw away the dam key. You deserve no better.

Jesus fucking christ, you are insane.

Jeez, do you fancy her and been turned down or something?

Well, that would be about right for pretty well most of these characters.

Whatever Gwen Gale's strengths or failings, and a quick look at her user page with its charming Japanese lolicon doll persuades me she's a pleasant enough old luvvy albeit one I wouldn't necessarily nominate to lead the local Brownies group, she does seem to be an anonymous administrator and thus untouchable, a local sheikh in a kingdom of her own accountable to no one but the flunkeys in her cabal, the Annes and Janes she draws to her side and pets and favours not with treats and sweets but with the wikitools they'll need to take their place in the paedocracy when they reach their menarche ... Wikipedia, the children's encyclopaedia any pedo can edit.

I suggest administrators should be directly responsible to a board of trustees independent of Wikipedia, should be public and should have their credentials verified. Nothing else will check their excesses and their pretensions.

Gwen Gale used to be an anonymous admin before she wrote two articles about herself. but this is an old story. She also used to be one of the most abusive and dishonest bullies on Wikipedia. Many editors tried to stop her, but failed. I did it. Gwen Gale has not bullied any one for almost 6 months, and I am very sure she never will. But to tell you the truth I cannot care less about Gwen Gale. She's not a bully anymore, and I am happy for her. I am mentioning Gwen Gale now only because this mention effects tarc as a red cloth effects a bull, and besides it so funny to taunt that stupid pit-bull that goes in circles ant bites its own tail.
So, tarc, Gwen Gale is a good admin now, and it was me who made her to change! And now go, bull, go. Please let's have some more fun.

Could you have a go at making AGK a good administrator now?

In particular could you get him to unblock my distant cousin RobvanderWaal, whose edits on Vincent van Gogh and late Amsterdam Impressionism were such a valuable contribution to Wikipedia. Examples include: Van Gogh's Hague Studio, 'At Eternity's Gate', Isaac Israëls in addition to a number of significant stubs such 'Tree Roots'. What Rob had in mind was a studio by studio account of Vincent's creative life and this project was cut short by AGK who checkused him and indefinitely blocked him after unsurprisingly finding a 'technical' link between him and cousin Rinpoche, that banned editor who so threatened Wikipedia's very fabric with his article start 'Buddhist Sex Abuse Cases'. The motive for the check use appears to be exception he took to Rob's spat at Major Depressive Disorder with a user Basilisk, apparently a Swansea schoolboy posing as a physician, but we know that AGK is not disinterested in that topic because he himself is bipolar (so he says) and, on the best information we have so far, probably in receipt of disability benefits in respect of his condition (and thus anxious to perpetuate romantic images stressing the incapacitating tendency of his condition).

Equally his block of DaftOldBat89, an elderly and distinguished lady, similarly motivated for reasons of spite following a gratuitous use of checkuser privileges, all of whose valuable William Wordsworth edits were reverted by Ktr101, Wikipedia's 474th most active user, a very smug and self-satisfied looking young man at Amhherst college in the USA the further progress of whose academic career must be in put in doubt thereby (and we haven't been slow to draw the matter to the attention of our American cousins).

I dealt with Gwen Gale mostly because she has bullied a 16 years old kid to the extend he felt as killing himself. Otherwise dealing with any particular bully at wikipedia (and I am not saying AGK is a bully, I know little about him) is nothing but a waste of time. There are too many of them, and their number is growing constantly.

Wikipedia is rotten from the very top. If Wikipedia co-founder Jimbo Wales tolerates our friend tarc at his own talk page, tolerates even after he was pointed out directly to tarc's rhetoric here, I am not sure what should I think about that site anymore. No, there's no use in trying to change an individual bully. Wikipedia should be changed as whole.


As it was described in "Two Minutes Hate" , ''1984'' by
George Orwell that site turns people "into a grimacing, screaming lunatics" , and tarc is a great example of this.

When back in Soviet Union I read this novel, I would not have ever believed that one day Soviet Union will fail, but it did! Although now it is hard to imagine that Wikipedia, I mean Wikipedia as we know it now will fail, I am very sure it will, or maybe not fail, but become a better, safer, kinder place for kids and adults.

I find it charming that you STILL cling to this delusional fantasy that you have had any sort of effect anywhere. They even moderated your most recent post over at the 'ocracy;



and then locked the thread. Banned from en.wiki, banned from meta, probably about a hairsbreadth away from a ban at Commons, and even the 'ocracy doesn't put up with your delusional bullshit.

Y'know, its hard to be really angry at you, Mila...the pity we feel for you tends to overshadow any other emotion.

Well, zoloft, PMed me too. He told me he was unhappy when I said:
"When I opposed tarc's block on Commons, I called tarc a person. It was an overstatement because no person could behave as tarc does."
zoloft told it was dehumanization of tarc, but tarc, honestly, to you believe that somebody who wrote what you did in this thread could be called a person. To me it looked more like a barking of a pitbull not like a talk of a person.

Yes, I am blocked (not banned from meta) and banned on English wikipedia, but you know what I'd better be banned from wikimedia projects than to become one of these grimacing, screaming lunatics that witch-hunters that voted to ban lynch me just like in this video

Only in my situation it was worse because I was not allowed to say a word in my defense.
So, tarc, what are you happy about that wikipedia treats people worse than Inquisition did, worse than Soviet Union did?
As I've told you already, tarc, I am very proud to be excommunicated by these grimacing, screaming lunatics and witch-hunters because it means I've done something really, really good like for example turning one of them in a normal person.
Am I going to be banned from Commons? Well commons have not yet reached the level of idiocy of English wikipedia. As you probably know, tarc, a friend of yours Beeblebrox tried to make me "banned from commons" a week or so ago. The only thing he seceded in doing was demonstrating that each and every word I said about him was correct. BTW I missed you there. Your presence, tarc, would have made the thread much more entertaining.

BTW, tarc, your latest post sounds much more normal than the ones above it, which means that not only I've changed Gwen Gale to the best, but I have also changed you, tarc to the best. You still should work on trying not to lie, but thanks to me you're getting there, tarc.

Except that you haven't



Oh, Mila. There's nothing wrong with you that a stint in the gulag wouldn't cure.

How's that for "better", fuckwit?

Well, I was sure that you will do your best to prove that you cannot be changed to become, no, not a better person, but simply a person, and I was right! Once again a stupid pitbull goes around biting its own tail . Thanks for the fun,tarc, but because you keep repeating yourself, it is getting boring. Also thank you for allowing everybody to see what I meant when I quoted 1984 about grimacing,screaming lunatics. Jimbo and govcom that allow such lunatics to vote in ban discussions aren't any better than the lunatics themselves. Bye, tarc.

Maybe someday you will have a moment of clarity and realize all along that it is in fact you that is the bully, the aggressor, and the cause of your own problems.

Maybe you will realize that we are all the victims of your certifiably insane personality disorders.

I was not going to respond your insinuations anymore, poor victim , but this last claim amazed me because once again you've proven that lunatics that supported my ban are using methods that were popular in Communist countries. Allegations of psychiatric disorders were used in Communist Russia, used by KGB to persecute dissidents . You definitely would have made a very reliable KGB guard.

And now I really have to stop responding to you. I would have argued my points, if you were much more polite and much less stupid, but because as it said "there's no sins but stupidity" there's no use wasting my time, arguing with you about anything anymore.

Once again I'd like to thank you for providing me with more than enough material that are going to be very useful for my purpose.

Any theories as to why AGK hasn't made an edit since 29th June 2012? I should think the longest period of wikicontinence he has ever managed.

I'm a bit concerned because of his condition. I mean, god, what if he's harming himself or something? Self-mutilating obsessively, compulsively throwing himself under trains without being pushed, that sort of thing? I mean I swear I couldn't live with it ... it's very worrying and I'm at my wit's end what to do.

We need to help him, all of us at Wikipedia Review, and not just Tarc and Mila here, all of us who really care about these poor poor boys who are having their lives simply destroyed by Wikipedia?

Won't someone please help?

Mila, I am quite familiar with Soviet history, moreso than you realize. Fraudulent psychiatric diagnoses or not, I have to say that all of this Victim stuff is purely in your head. You blame everyone else for your wiki woes, but you know what the following have in common?

*Me
*Jimbo
*Meta admins
*en.wiki admins
*Arbcom

You. What is more likely; you are the lone crusader for justice and all these disparate entities are the bad guys, or that a bunch of different people are right, and you are the lunatic?

Btw, was linking to my Facebook profile supposed to prove something?


@FigfhtingMac; no one cares.

Well, I care.

I care desperately. This poor dear dear boy. How can you be so insensitive and cynical?

For all we know he might be hanging from a rope under the railway bridge at Cambuslang (the one which has ramps both sides leading down to the platforms) at this very moment and all I can say if he is then I know who to point the finger at!

I think it's time you thought through your issues here. I really do.

Tarc, if you are familiar with Soviet history you probably heard about Boris Pasternak http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boris_Pasternak who was expelled (excommunicated) from the society of Russian writers.
It was very, very common in Communist Russia to excommunicate, expel, denounce, execute absolutely innocent people. Many famous, well-known writers, scientists, whatever, were putting their signatures under these documents. Does it mean that Pasternak and others like him were lunatics? No, their persecutes were.

In my situation even leaving alone my guilt or innocence, I was persecuted by a bunch of anonymous nobodies, and without any ability to defend myself (even my talk page access was revoked). This kind of proceedings are unacceptable in civilized world, and everybody who voted to support my ban under such conditions are "screaming, grimacing lunatics" described in "1984" Period.
Jimbo, govcom and everybody who saw it and kept silent are dishonest cowards and I have no respect for any of them.

More lies. You had ample time to defend yourself, both at en.wiki and at meta. The near-universal opinion is that your complaints had no merit.

I note that you snipped my question regarding facebook, so I will ask again; was there a purpose to posting a link there?

Tarc, Mila

Thank you for demonstrating why Selina must pull her finger out and appoint a moderator.

FightingMac

You do know you have to use the emoticon, don't you?

Make me a mod, I'll curb-stomp this problem in a heartbeat.

tarc, everybody knows you are a liar, but I do not understand what is the point in lying, if it so easy to prove you are?
I was under a self-requested block since July of 2012, and was able to edit only my own talk.
I was reblocked by govcom on February 7,2012
My talk page access was revoked on February 9,2012
My ban discussion that lasted one day started on February 11 and ended up on February 12.
So how could I have defend myself on English wikipedia?
Defending myself on Meta ended up in blocking of course. Although it is rather funny.
Nobody sees anything wrong in re-blocking and banning me from English wikipedia over an absolutely valid RFC I filed at Meta, but when I defend myself at meta over block on English wikipedia, I am told I am exporting conflicts to other sites. Go figure

Detective, you are absolutely right. I should not have fed a troll because it is not kind and not wise. On the other hand Selina should have removed tarc's screaming right away... Whatever... With this I am out of this forum for good. I will not even read it anymore.
Bye , guys, it was nice to know some of you.

Well, okay but honestly I'm really worried.

Can I just use the forum to ask people, especially those who happen to commute through Cambuslang railway station or other similarly eponymous railway stations near Glasgow typically serving tough delinquent dormitory towns of the sort Anthony as a practising Roman Catholic trainee pilot with obsessive compulsive bipolar disorder and a supportive family feels so comfortable with, to keep an eye out for obviously distressed anoraks lying in the foetal position under benches at the end of railway platforms bit like Voldermort in the last HP, keening and moaning in obvious distress about being 'heisted' and other inchoate nonsense like that?

But whatever you do don't try to kick him under a passing train yourself

These people need to be attended to by specially trained teams wearing protective clothing employing state of the art equipment. Just put a brief notice of where and when you sighted him here and Mossad Wikipedia ArbCom will get one of their teams out to do the business with a minimum of fuss and maximum discretion the way they always do so well with their failed brethren (actually most likely a cushion and needle job not that you should necessarily read anything overly sinister and fanciful into that).

It will be like he never had an account. Really.

Thank You.

More lies and distortion. You were at AN/I too many times to count, and frequently e-mailed Jimbo and Arbcom. So much so that I wouldn't be surprised if they blacklisted you. Every venue you have been to, people have found you to be the abuser and the aggressor.

Ever been tested for autism, Mila? I have a guess on where you'd fall on the spectrum.




LOL

You neurotic asshole liar, you will never walk away from this or any other internet forum where there's even the slightest chance that someone is talking about you. You will return here daily to check up on the latest posts. Guaran-fucking-tee it.

And for a 3rd time you duck the Facebook question, why is that, Mila? You are aware that that picture on there is not of me, right?