Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: General Discussion
> Wikimedia Discussion > General Discussion
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
  1. Wikipedia 4eva! (5 replies)
  2. Wikimedia Foundation Credit Card (3 replies)
  3. Scaling Up (22 replies)
  4. Mysterious oversighted edits (11 replies)
  5. Almost a failure (4 replies)
  6. Number of users watching a page (32 replies)
  7. Korea has a VANK over the internet (3 replies)
  8. Poor Man's Flagged Revisions Fix (13 replies)
  9. Wikireader (2 replies)
  10. Of Wicked Witches and Children's Stories (332 replies)
  11. Google "Work From Home" Scam (0 replies)
  12. Are WP admins like unionized schoolteachers? (9 replies)
  13. WMF looking for in-person interviews (1 replies)
  14. Wikipedia Logo Letter from Michael Snow and Jimmy Wales (11 replies)
  15. Objectivism and Wikipedia (99 replies)
  16. Wikipedia Server Upgrade (14 replies)
  17. Wikipedia's aims are nefarious (20 replies)
  18. Can I award myself barnstars? (32 replies)
  19. 1981 births (46 replies)
  20. Flagged Revisions to the rescue (21 replies)
  21. Please userfy this page (85 replies)
  22. Fundamental reform of Wikipedia (82 replies)
  23. Well well well I guess there is a Satan (3 replies)
  24. Wikipedia losing the favor of the press (15 replies)
  25. The Idiots guide to the fall of the English Wikipedia (6 replies)
  26. The Col writes to Darrenhusted (14 replies)
  27. Blocked Indefinitely: The Musical (33 replies)
  28. Help, I have more than one account (5 replies)
  29. Storm the WMF headquarters again! (20 replies)
  30. Wika-Wakka (1 replies)
  31. Is Wikipedia a totalitarian state? (61 replies)
  32. A Bounty for Buttock Augmentation (5 replies)
  33. Moved: You might like this page (-- replies)
  34. Moved: Wikipedia:Article Incubator (-- replies)
  35. Raiding exploits on Wikipedia (46 replies)
  36. Gamaliel 2 year rangeblock (43 replies)
  37. Hans Adler Comments on Wikipedia (4 replies)
  38. WIKIPEDIA - PIT OF DESPAIR part 2 (3 replies)
  39. Mentors and Minotaurs (5 replies)
  40. Jeremy Rosenfeld (5 replies)
  41. Brandmeister taking a bold stance against The Gays (30 replies)
  42. Sockpuppets and secondary accounts (55 replies)
  43. Can you show me on the Edit Log where Wikia touched you? (17 replies)
  44. The Forum that Shall Not be Named (11 replies)
  45. Moved: Wiki-Conference New York (-- replies)
  46. Ted Kennedy not notable enough for the Main Page (102 replies)
  47. Drawings for sex topics (22 replies)
  48. Age verification for nudes (31 replies)
  49. Worthless sub-stub athlete articles (31 replies)
  50. Two new Wikipedia gadgets (0 replies)
  51. Could use some help and eyes on en.Wikiversity (21 replies)
  52. Liskula Cohen, Solers, defamation, and possible Section 230 issues (6 replies)
  53. Socksequences (8 replies)
  54. Citizendium "Expertise" (30 replies)
  55. Academic Studies of Wikipedia (4 replies)
  56. Wikipedia Insular, New Study Shows (9 replies)
  57. Wikademia activates the spam filter at Wikiversity (0 replies)
  58. BLP task force (19 replies)
  59. 'make a book' feature (10 replies)
  60. Hoaxes on the Main Page (15 replies)
  61. Wikipedia not educational (32 replies)
  62. The Dark Hand of Censorship strikes at the freedom of speech (15 replies)
  63. Orwellian Wikipedia Signpost archives (11 replies)
  64. Concealed messages (43 replies)
  65. Copyrights and wrongs (14 replies)
  66. Today's Featured Article: Grope-cunt Lane (75 replies)
  67. No Personal Attacks - a history lesson (13 replies)
  68. Wikipedia "objectionable to children under 17" (1 replies)
  69. Wikipedia's Boundaries (28 replies)
  70. More on reliable sources (18 replies)
  71. Knol Adds LaTeX Support (16 replies)
  72. The Biggest Cabal (9 replies)
  73. Highly deceptive, aggressive advertising on Wikia (24 replies)
  74. Reading list (10 replies)
  75. Cash-puppetry (1 replies)
  76. You and Me and P.B. Shelley (8 replies)
  77. Admin anomie (9 replies)
  78. The "Credibility Campaign" (30 replies)
  79. What Does Semiprotection really do anyway (35 replies)
  80. History of the Universe in 200 words (19 replies)
  81. Vandalism and Socks, a nice theory salad (6 replies)
  82. The Wikipedia DramaOut (56 replies)
  83. A Serious Alternative to Wikipedia (47 replies)
  84. Google Wins British Libel Case (11 replies)
  85. What really is in Wikipedia? (14 replies)
  86. Should Notability be based on the number of people (12 replies)
  87. What is/was your contention with Wikipedia? (22 replies)
  88. Chet's request for restoration of his admin bit (76 replies)
  89. No Drama WIN (23 replies)
  90. Prostitute featured on Commons (23 replies)
  91. How to utterly destroy Wikipedia (378 replies)
  92. Tribal authority on Wikipedia (8 replies)
  93. Eminent Academics (24 replies)
  94. Wikipedia: the great blog echochamber (1 replies)
  95. Boy Scouts are for spanking? (185 replies)
  96. Jimbo disses trolls (8 replies)
  97. A Marxist Critique of the Wikipedia (0 replies)
  98. BBC Radio Comedy series "Bigipedia" (8 replies)
  99. Simple shrinks by 10% (40 replies)
  100. Request for image creation help (10 replies)
  101. Vandalism study (35 replies)
  102. New World Encyclopedia (12 replies)
  103. Review of Andrew Lih's Wikipedia book (0 replies)
  104. Things that Wikipedia can never eliminate (2 replies)
  105. Kosmix MetaMashup Engine (0 replies)
  106. Theory and Practice of Disruption (15 replies)
  107. Possibly the most ridiculous reason to quit wikipedia I have ever seen (24 replies)
  108. Many Eyes (3 replies)
  109. 300 millionth edit (20 replies)
  110. Moved: A. Rand's 'Atlas Shrugged' is Con'pedia Featured Article (-- replies)
  111. Great moments in Wikipedia history (78 replies)
  112. Great Moments in Our Glorious Leader's Life (4 replies)
  113. Importing Citizendium articles under the new license (20 replies)
  114. The disappearing of Ariel Glenn (4 replies)
  115. Competition: best rejected source (4 replies)
  116. NYT Expose on JW's manipulation of WP (3 replies)
  117. Newbie asks: who are the administrators and higher-ups? (15 replies)
  118. Godwin (4 replies)
  119. Oversight logs (19 replies)
  120. And now for something completely relevant (8 replies)
  121. A thank you from mr. tiny (3 replies)
  122. James Forrester wants to be my Friend (8 replies)
  123. Why does Brett Favre hate Wikipedia? (3 replies)
  124. "Nuke" feature (28 replies)
  125. Even Norwegians criticize Jimmy Wales (3 replies)
  126. The "Durova dustup" in print (4 replies)
  127. Saving the Criticism Section? (9 replies)
  128. No idea (19 replies)
  129. Hello, help and how come? (21 replies)
  130. Teampuppetry (15 replies)
  131. coup d'licence (8 replies)
  132. What stuff more important than teen culture? (34 replies)
  133. Creating "trolls" (7 replies)
  134. Thoughts on Wikinews (43 replies)
  135. Proponents of censorship (21 replies)
  136. Moved: Hey guys, new here.. (-- replies)
  137. Is Jimbo jetting to Bulgaria for a "date"? (22 replies)
  138. Broken Moral Compass (0 replies)
  139. Stani bogat? (1 replies)
  140. Surveying opinions (10 replies)
  141. How to become rich and powerful from your Wikipedia involvement (1 replies)
  142. Admin using childish block messages (8 replies)
  143. Articles in Law Gazette (0 replies)
  144. Narcissism 101 (25 replies)
  145. The Ballad of ThePizzaMakingCaveman (168 replies)
  146. "Catalyst WebQ" (4 replies)
  147. Yet another right-wing "Christian" wiki (38 replies)
  148. Runciman on Wikipedia (6 replies)
  149. DYK; a main page embarrassment or a worthwhile enterprise? (48 replies)
  150. Jimmy Wales is a $25,000 question on "Millionaire" (30 replies)
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.